Showing posts with label skype. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skype. Show all posts

Monday, 13 October 2014

LG G3 vs. iPhone 6 Plus specs: Same screen size, a whole lot of different features

 By: 

After the launching of the iPhone 6 Plus, it has often been compared with one of LG's latest offerings, the G3. Although both devices have 5.5-inch screens, they may have more differences than similarities.
[Photo credit: Facebook]
LG G3
Looking into more details, LG's flagship boasts a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels that provides a highly rich experience for users, whereas Apple's offering provides 1344 x 750 resolution, significantly lower than that of the G3.  Nonetheless, with 16:9 aspect ratio, such device still offers clear and detailed images and videos.
In terms of storage and memory, the LG G3 is available only in a 16 GB or 32 GB version, but can be expanded as it supports microSD cards of up to 128 GB.
On the other hand, the iPhone Plus does not come with a microSD slot but offers 16 GB, 64 GB and 128 GB models. The device also provides a cloud storage option and a greater capacity for internal storage options.  Users can utilize 5 GB of cloud storage, free of charge, along with the Photo Stream for one's pictures.
The LG G3 comes with a 13-megapixel camera, whereas the iPhone 6 Plus features an 8-megapixel camera that is similar to a previous model, the iPhone 5S. As such, the G3 is expected to snap photos and capture clips that are of higher quality.  It also allows users to shoot 4K videos, which the iPhone is not capable of doing. Nonetheless, the iPhone 6 Plus comes with faster auto-focus and wide angle lens.
[Photo credit: Apple]
iPhone 6 Plus
A Snapdragon 801 chip set that comes with a 2.5 Ghz quad-core processor has been incorporated into the LG G3, which runs on the Android 4.4.2 KitKat operating system.  With the special Andreno 330 GPU, such device has been praised for the graphics it generates, which are comparable to those of game consoles.
Meanwhile, the iPhone 6 Plus makes use of the new A8 chip set that enables Apple's offering to carry out desktop-level performance.
Other features for the LG G3 include protective recommendations from Smart Notice, new ways of unlocking the phone through the KNOCK Code, and wireless charging, among others.
The iPhone 6 Plus, on the other hand, features a new mobile payment platform, thanks to near field communication (NFC); the phone also comes with a larger battery (2915 mAh), supports third-party keyboards, and features optical image stabilization for enhanced photo capture.

Saturday, 11 October 2014

It's Sexy, But Will The Passport Help BlackBerry Regain Dominance As A Status Symbol?


By: Bob Egan

BlackBerry’s new Passport is eye-catching. Women call it “sexy.” Men say it’s “cool.” And once they use it, iPhone owners apologetically concede that they “only have an iPhone.”
But does that mean BlackBerry is poised to regain a dominant share of the mass handset market?
Hold that thought. I’ll come back to answer that question in a minute.
I have to admit, when I saw the Passport for the first time a few months ago, I was skeptical. “A big, fat, square device? What? Didn’t BlackBerry say it was all but getting out of the device business?”
Now, I know better. BlackBerry has several new devices in the design/release queue.
Granted, the Passport may look like a misfit in a sea of norms, but that’s precisely what makes it such an elegant, modern conversation starter. I even conducted an informal experiment to prove it. After I received a Passport to use nearly three weeks ago, I tried it out, and then I shared it with random people so I could hear their opinions, too. In all, I spoke with about 50 people, and the results are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 - People describe BlackBerry's Passport as Sexy and Cool
Figure 1 – People describe BlackBerry’s Passport as Sexy and Cool
Whether I was standing in a TSA line at an airport, or minding my own business during a flight, people near me asked about the Passport. During a recent trip between Boston and Atlanta, Alexander, a Delta flight attendant, actually leaned over the passenger sitting next to me and asked, “Hey, is that the new BlackBerry? How do you like it?” Mind you, I was actually typing the first draft of this post on my Passport when he interrupted. I handed him the device and told him to try it out for a while. Then there was Sandra, a well-known graphic illustrator and personal friend, who I just happened to run into. “What the heck is that?” was quickly followed by, “This device is damn sexy! Is it really a BlackBerry? Can you get me one?”
Photo Courtesy of: Lucas Atkins from N4BB.com
Photo Courtesy of: Lucas Atkins from N4BB.com
One of the most surprising, if not insightful, conversations was the one I had with Brett Belding over dinner. Brett, who is responsible for the managementand deployment of some 76K devices in his organization, told me: “I get what BlackBerry is doing here. It’s good. It’s innovative. And it’s about time. Apple’s iPhone democratized the market. Android came out and bottomed the market. BlackBerry’s biggest mistake is that they abandoned their core and chased the commoditizing consumer.”
He’s right, of course.
Before the iPhone was released in 2007, if you were sitting in a meeting or moving through an airport with a BlackBerry in your hand, you were somebody. You were important. You were a person on a mission to get things done, not play games. In fact, even in light of the overwhelming success of the iPhone, BlackBerry continued to grow unit sales for nearly four years after the iPhone was introduced. There’s no question that top to bottom, Apple’s application and device stack is the most complete. But perhaps therein lies the problem: Apple and Android solutions are good at many things, but great at nothing. Their phones are for the communized masses.
When someone says, “Well, I only carry an Apple,” they’re admitting to not feeling special. They don’t feel part of the elite culture of the movers or shakers who once carried a BlackBerry.
So rather than ask if BlackBerry can regain its dominance of the handset market, perhaps the better question to ask is this: Can BlackBerry regain its dominance as a status symbol?
Possibly.
But, the company has to clear a few hurdles.

First, let’s face it, BlackBerry has a long way to go – especially in the handset business. The BlackBerry graveyard is littered with plenty of evidence of past efforts: the underpowered “I can be like Apple” Z10, the “remember when” nostalgic Q10, the “I can be like Android” Z3… and the list goes on and on. Even BlackBerry’s Z30, which I regard as a very good device, was a marketing disaster. These and other missteps are why BlackBerry finds itself facing so many challenges today.

Second, BlackBerry’s app strategy is full of holes. The Passport natively supports both BlackBerry World and Amazon’s App store, and that’s two weak stores too many. And with OS version 10.3. you can even slideload the GooglePlay store with an application called Snap. BlackBerry needs to kill its BB World and Amazon stores as they exist and strike a deal with Google. If it doesn’t, no one will care that Passports (or future devices) have the critical items for executive users or brand affinity buyers (e.g. Porsche ). The perception will linger that BlackBerry is not the premium supplier.
Of course, as we all know, past performance is no guarantee of future results –and in the case of BlackBerry, let’s hope that’s true. After all, the past disappointments around handsets have overshadowed the positive steps BlackBerry has taken with other products, in infrastructure and organizationally.
In one year, Blackberry’s new executive team has rescued the company from death’s doorstep and eliminated crucial business risk for its customers –and business risk, not technology risk, has been BlackBerry’s Achilles’ heel. Perhaps the most significant evidence for the progress is the visibility to BlackBerry’s most recent quarter, where 3.4 million licenses were issued for BES 10, almost tripling the 1.2 millions licenses in the prior quarter. Some dismissed this progress due to BlackBerry’s essential license trade-up giveaway owed to EZPass, but it’s worth noting that CIOs and IT Management are smart enough to know that even if something is free, it’s still too expensive if it’s bad. EZPass converts made good choices for good reasons.
It’s time the industry starts thinking about BlackBerry as a software and infrastructure company which also happens to makes handsets that cater to an elite market. Citrix, VMware , IBM, Microsoft, Cisco and Extreme Networks are its primary competitors, not MobileIron, Good Technology or SOTI.
BlackBerry may not be back yet, but I do think the company is finding its escape velocity. Now, the company must stay focused and execute. Company acquisitions and BlackBerry’s November release of its BES 12 network appliance should help carry the momentum.
And let’s not underestimate the “cool” factor. Based on my own research, people want the Passport because it’s different from the Apple norm we’ve been seeing since the first iPhone was introduced seven years ago. It has “cool” and “I’m important” written all over it. If BlackBerry can succeed in “bringing sexy back,” the Passport and perhaps BlackBerry has a real shot at becoming the new status symbol for a population desperately looking for something new.

Motorola Moto X (2014) Review: The Year's Best Smartphone




Motorola is on a some roll. Since relaunching under Google’s tutelage last year, the company has produced four superb handsets: the original Moto G and Moto X and following them in 2014 with budget champion the Moto Eand the superb new Moto G. Now Motorola is refreshing the Moto X and after critical, but not commercial, acclaim it really means business.

How good is the new Moto X? In short it is the best smartphone I’ve used this year. Yes that means better than the LG G3Nokia Lumia 930HTC One M8,Samsung Galaxy S5Sony Xperia Z3 and iPhone 6 (though your choice of ecosystem will determine this). Yes the much anticipated Nexus 6 is still to be released this year, but that’s a phablet.
So let’s break down why I think so highly of it.
Left to right: HTC One M8, Moto X (2104), iPhone 6 Plus
Left to right: HTC One M8, Moto X (2104), iPhone 6 Plus (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Design – Tough, Practical And Surprisingly Compact
There is no denying large screens are in, but they aren’t to everyone’s taste so when Motorola announced the 4.7-inch screen on the original Moto X would be bumped to a massive 5.2-inches many sighed – myself included.
So here comes the good news: Motorola has pulled it off. The 2014 Moto X measures 140.8 x 72.4 x 10 mm (5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39-inches) and weighs 144 g (5.08 oz). To put this in context, that’s shorter and narrower than the 5.1-inch Galaxy S5 and dramatically shorter and lighter than the 5-inch HTC One M8 (146.4mm and 160g).
Moto X curvature (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Moto X curvature (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Even the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 isn’t significantly smaller and while the iPhone 6 Plus has a screen that is only 0.3-inches larger than the new Moto X, side-by-side the difference in size is dramatic. Make no mistake, this is still a smartphone not a phablet.
The trick lies in the bezels. The 2014 Moto X has dramatically thinner bezels than its predecessor and only LG’s G3 can come close – but that’s another 5.5-inch phablet. The fact the Moto X has roughly the same footprint as the LG made 5-inch Nexus 5 (you can just about see its metal edging sneaking out when they are placed one atop of the other) is a testament to Motorola’s design team.
5-inch Nexus 5 resting on top of the 5.2-inch Moto X
5-inch Nexus 5 resting on top of the 5.2-inch Moto X (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Furthermore the Moto X is rock solid. The aluminium chassis adds incredible rigidity and it came ‘top’ in the controversial bendgate tests. The rubber rear may not look the most glamourous, but this gives it more grip than its rivals and the sunken circular Motorola logo acts as a pleasant resting point for your index finger. Furthermore the curvature means it feels great in hand and it is something I’ve personally missed in the iPhone range since the 3GS.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
There are also a couple of neat touches. The camera lens is protected by the ringed dual flash (more later) and the power and volume buttons are distinguished by the textured finish to the former. I would prefer the power and volume buttons on different sides of the phone, but it feels like a small niggle.
Features – Out To Compete With The Best

Motorola has earned a lot of praise for the way its recent handsets outperform rivals, despite not featuring the most cutting edge specifications. Yes Motorola has been the Apple of the iPhone world. But this changes with the new Moto X.

On paper the company’s flagship means business. The aforementioned 5.2-inch screen packs a Full HD 1080p AMOLED display which makes colours strikingly rich and vivid and combines them with great viewing angles. In fact I’d put it ahead of any other 1080p smartphone display I’ve seen.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Inside you’ll find a Qualcomm Snagpdragon 801 chip which puts it inline with the Galaxy S5, One M8 and LG G3 and is a dramatic step up from the ageing MSM8960Pro Snapdragon used in the original Moto X. There’s also 2GB of RAM and a quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 GPU.
The next upgrade is the camera. Motorola has increased the resolution from 10 to 13 megapixels, added a dual LED flash and offered 4k video recording. The front camera remains 2 megapixels, but still supports 1080p video recording.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Another welcome (and surprising) move is the shift to a front facing external speaker which produces loud, clear and surprisingly rich (for a phone speaker) audio that is great for listening to the talk radio or podcasts. Only the HTC One range with its dual front facing speakers can beat it and the fact Motorola has slightly raised it and the earpiece at the top mean they protect the screen during falls.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Raised, front facing speaker sounds great and protects the screen (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Caveats? There are a couple. The most significant is the absence of a microSD expansion slot, something that has come back into fashion with its rivals. Its a surprising absence given the cheaper Moto G has one and with just 16 and 32GB configurations the Moto X lacks the capacity of some. The battery is also fixed.
Aside from this the lack of OIS (optical image stabilisation) in the camera is a shame and a crucial factor for shooting smooth video and the longer exposure times required when taking photos in low light. Finally there is no waterproofing like the Galaxy S5 and Xperia range. As such there may be a few deal breakers in here for some.
Android on the Moto X (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Android on the Moto X (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Software – The Motorola Touch
Where the Moto X immediately gets back in my good books though is its implementation of Android. For all intents and purposes Motorola uses stock Android on its handsets and the Moto X is no different.
This has two major benefits: firstly the Moto X is incredibly responsive as it operates without a third party skin. Secondly it allows Motorola to push out updates to the latest version of Android very quickly.
Current Motos have received updates within 30 days of a new Android release (making a mockery of some rival’s lead times of 3-6 months) and Motorola promises the same again with the upcoming release of Android L (expected to be Android   v5.0). This could well beat some Google Play Edition handsets, if not quite the Nexus range.
In addition to this Motorola does add a few apps of its own but, unlike the much criticised bloatware from Samsung, these are subtle, well thought out and genuinely useful.
Motorola Moto Tweaks (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Motorola Android Tweaks (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
For example, ‘Moto Voice’ lets you use voice commands even when the phone is locked (and pick any trigger phrase you like) and ‘Moto Display’ uses front mounted sensors to display the time when you wave a hand over it, while a ‘peak’ view lets you preview notifications in the lock screen without having to open them.
There is also ‘Moto Migrate’ which transfers all files, call records and your SMS history over from your old phone (iPhone or Android) and ‘Moto Assist’ which automatically mutes notifications at night, reads received messages aloud when driving and silences the phone when it detects you are in meetings (taken from your calendar).
Its great stuff you wish Google would implement, rather than garbage that replicates existing Android features. Samsung take note.
Left to right: Moto X and Nexus 5 (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Left to right: Moto X and Nexus 5 (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Performance – Fastest Android Experience To Date
The cat may already be out the bag here, but the combination of the Moto X’s top end hardware and stock Android makes from a fearsome combination. Navigating around the UI is faster and more fluid than any handset I’ve used so far (including the Nexus 5) and there is quite simply nothing game-wise within the Google Play store that can trouble it.
When heavily tested the back of the phone can get warm, but it doesn’t reach the red hot temperatures I’ve experienced from the Nexus 5 and HTC One M8.
Of course the Snapdragon 805 is on the horizon, which will have a few spec warriors concerned about investing in the Moto X. I wouldn’t worry. The 805 offers incremental performance and battery improvements over the 801, but when your phone is already lightning fast and long lasting it should already do everything you need.
Moto X battery usage (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Moto X battery usage (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Battery Life – All Day Stamina Even With Heavy Use
Which leads us nicely onto battery life. There has been some concern at the 2300mAh battery inside the Moto X when capacities of between 2600 and 3000mAh are becoming standard on big screen phones.
In reality the bad news is this means you don’t quite get the superb battery life of Galaxy S5, One M8 or LG G3 (though this is technically a phablet), but the good news is it is still excellent.
With heavy use the Moto X consistently lasted me over 20 hours with around 10% left on the battery. Given a ‘normal day’ should be around 15 hours including an evening out (8am to 11pm) I can’t see even serious gamers running into too many problems.
Yes the S5, M8 and G3 tend to last 1.5 days, but the reality is surviving a long day of heavy use is the benchmark phones should meet and the Moto X (unlike the Nexus 5 and iPhone 6) achieves it. Only if you have an aversion to plugging your phone in at night should be be concerned.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Camera – Very Capable But Not The Best
Which leads us to perhaps the one area where I have slight reservations. Let me be clear: the camera in the Moto X is excellent. In fact it would possibly be class leading even a generation ago, but it can’t quite keep up with its main rivals in late 2014.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
What I primarily put this down to is the lack of OIS (optical image stabilisation). In good conditions photos look fantastic and there’s great use of bokeh which can produce some really dramatic shots.
The problem is without OIS there are more blurred photos and in low light the longer exposures also pick up small shakes which can impact shots. Likewise the Moto X’s 4K video recording is crystal clear, but if you don’t have a steady hand the wobbles it picks up diminish results, notably for video taken on the move.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
For me OIS (and digital image stabilisation – DIS – as seen in the iPhone 6) is now a key feature for every modern smartphones.
Where the phone comes fighting back are its best shot and and ‘Highlight Reel’. The former takes shots both before and after you do which is great for moments you just missed and the latter automatically creates Google+ style albums and slideshows. Neither feature is new, but they work well and the Highlight Reel offers greater sharing flexibility than HTC’s equivalent ‘Zoe’.
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
(image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Price And Availability – A Bargain
Furthermore the Moto X really causes a stir when it comes to pricing. The Moto X will launch this month and on a two year contract it will cost just $99, undercutting most rivals by $100 while it costs a bargain $450 without a contact. This is substantially less than anything but the Nexus range and theOnePlus One phablet.
Couple this with Motorola’s commitment to fast Android updates which gives the handset longevity (Android L claims to bring better performance and battery life) and the new Moto X is an indisputable bargain.
5.2-inch Moto X vs 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
5.2-inch Moto X vs 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus (image credit: Gordon Kelly)
Verdict
The new Moto X is my smartphone pick of 2014. The reason is because it is such a complete package. It packs the biggest and best 1080p display I’ve seen inside the sector’s most compact and toughest form factor and marries it with barnstorming performance, what amounts to stock Android with some very smart tweaks, strong battery life, a very able camera and a great price.
There are caveats: the lack of OIS, expandable storage, a removable battery and water resistance will be deal breakers for some. But as a whole for me the Moto X breaks new ground, it is what a flagship Android handset should be: the thoughtful combination of hardware and software. iPhone owners have long been able to crow about this, but now Android has its own pin-up.
For Motorola the big question will be whether this Moto X will sell better than the last? I don’t know. As HTC discovered with the One M7 and M8, being the best phone at launch is far from a guarantee of commercial success. But one thing is certain: the new Moto X deserves to be a massive hit.

Unwillingness of Major Retailers to Adopt Apple Pay

Major retailers show unwillingness to adopt Apple Pay ahead of expected launch

Apple Pay is primed to launch as one of the most secure and convenient digital payments solutions ever devised, but certain popular retailers may slow adoption by refusing to offer support due to a conservative stance on next-gen commerce or conflict with their own ambitions in the sector. 

When Apple announced Apple Pay at its iPhone 6 event in September, the company revealed that it had struck deals with all three major credit card networks — Visa, MasterCard and American Express — as well as top card-issuing banks like Citi, Chase and Wells Fargo. While a huge step in payments branding never before achieved, Apple still faces significant hurdles in winning widespread adoption with merchants. 

The Daily Dot compiled a list of retailers hesitant to get on board the Apple Pay bandwagon, illustrating the complex network of alliances necessary for an industry newcomer to roll out an entirely new platform. Indeed, many firms entrenched in traditional credit card systems are wary that Apple and its tokenized payment method could upend the industry.

The publication first points to Best Buy, questioning why the big-box electronics store, supposedly in tune with cutting edge technology, is not supportive of Apple's new solution. Those closely following the subject will remember that Best Buy is partnered with the likes of Walmart in a consortium of powerful retailers called the Merchant Customer Exchange, which is trying to get its own out-of-network payments systems off the ground. 

Unsurprisingly, both Best Buy and Walmart said in September that they had no plans to support Apple Pay.
"While we will not be accepting Apple Pay at this time, we will continue to evaluate it as an option, as well as several other competing platforms," Best Buy spokesman Jeff Shelman told The Daily Dot.
Other big-name stores are also reticent about plans to adopt Apple's NFC-powered payments initiative, including Bed, Bath & Beyond, department stores Sears, Kmart and Belk, clothing brands H&M and Coach, BP gas stations, grocery chain Publix, and restaurants Chipotle, Pizza Hut and KFC. Worldwide coffee purveyor Starbucks will fold Apple Pay compatibility into its iOS app, but is not looking to install NFC point-of-sale terminals at its outlets anytime soon. 


As noted by payments and banking expert Tom Noyes of Starpoint Blog, companies like Starbucks already have effective mobile app strategies complete with built-in customer engagement systems (Starbucks Rewards offers a free drink for every 12 food or drink purchases) and may not be interested in Apple Pay. At this point, Apple promises to streamline and secure mobile and eCommerce payments for consumers, but offers little in the way of new value for merchants.


Apple Pay is set to cause a splash in the large payments pond, but the ripples may not reach as far as some believe. At least not at first. 
Apple is rumored to activate Apple Pay assets for iPhone 6 users with the upcoming iOS 8.1 maintenance update. Hidden Passbook settings menus and a privacy policy for Apple Pay credit card purchases were discovered in the most recent iOS 8.1 beta 2 build, suggesting a public launch is drawing near. Apple may choose to release the software update at a special media event scheduled for Oct. 16, at which the company is expected to unveil new iPad models.