Showing posts with label Lenovo vibe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lenovo vibe. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

Samsung To Revolutionize WiFi Speed



An In Depth Analysis of Samsung's Latest Technology

Samsung To Revolutionize WiFi Speed
Samsung’s engineers and development lab have been busy. Usually we are amazed by the unrivaled power of its smartphones and microchips. But this time, the smartphone giant has something extra special for us. Samsung recently revealed the new WiFi wireless standard it has been working on: the 802.11ad, which is potentially five times faster than what we have currently.
What’s so special about this new standard? As is the case with wireless standards today, there are always two specs to be aware of. The theoretical speed the standard can reach and its actual performance. Usually the two are very distinct due to a variety of environmental reasons, although that might all change now.  

The numbers associated with the new technology are staggering. It runs on 60Ghz, and will offer up to 4.6 Gigabits per second, translating into an amazing 565 Megabytes per second (5 times faster than the current 866 megabits per second/108 Megabytes per second). The Korean technology giant claimed that in the most ideal conditions, the technology could transmit a 1GB video in just 3 seconds and could easily support multiple HD streams simultaneously.
So how have they managed to achieve this? To understand the new technology, we must first look back at what currentstandards offer. Wireless standards started with the 802.11b, which is now rare and outdated. It was followed by the currently more common gn, and ac standards. Each of these have a high theoretical limit but perform a lot worse in real world conditions. The answer to that partly lies in the frequency and the number of networks running in the same physical space. “G” operates on 2.4GHz radio signal, “N” operates on both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz band while “AC” runs exclusively on the 5Ghz band.
It is common knowledge that the 24 Ghz is extremely crowded—there is a lot of interference from the various networks (WiFi or otherwise) that run on this frequency. While there are 14 channels available, one can only use around 3 to 4 channels and if you have many networks running the same channel, you can safely expect network performance to run like a drunken turtle. This is why when the most common Wireless “N” and later the wireless “AC” was released, they used the 5Ghz—much wider band making it easier to not worry much about interference.
Another factor impeding actual performance is signal loss due objects around us. Theoretical limits are usually tested in laboratories where the network runs in optimum conditions. But when you set up a network at your office, for example, the signal has to deal with walls, halls, bends, tables, chairs, and floors; all this contributes in degrading the signal.
An interesting point to note is that as you move to a higherfrequency band, range decreases severely: so a 5Ghz signal will generally have a lot less range than a 2.4Ghz signal if both are set up as an omni-directional antenna forming a spherical bubble around the transmitting device.
How has Samsung dealt with all these issues?For the co-channel interferenceproblem, as mentioned earlier, the 802.11 ad runs at 60Ghz. So if the 5Ghz network had little inference problem, now the case is even less so. Samsung said, “Unlike the existing 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi technologies, Samsung's 802.11 ad standard 60GHz Wi-Fi technology maintains maximum speeds by eliminating co-channel interference, regardless of the number of devices using the same network.”
But then how will they deal with the short range? Samsung has taken the beam-forming idea from “N” and “AC” standards, and improved upon it to ensure that signals are as strong as possible.
What is beam forming? Well, unlike the idea of spreading signals uniformly with an omni-directional antenna as a sphere , beam forming allows the signal to be broadcast directly from the access point or router to your wireless device and back (without wasting signals in space).
So what does this all mean? For the first time we may actually see real-world speeds come close, at least closer than they have been in the past, to theoretical limits. So while you may not actually have 1GB transfer in 3 seconds, you can expect it to do so much faster than what you currently have. It is important to note however, that a network is only as fast as its slowest component. So unless all your devices work on the new standard, you won’t be able to enjoy its benefits. But Samsung said it is likely that compatible devices will start appearing next year and the new technology will be integral to upcoming gadgets like the Galaxy S6 smartphone and Smart Home device.
Is internet broadband fast enough to keep up with the technical marvel from the Korean giant? That’s the real question.

HTC Desire Eye vs. LG G3 – Specifications, Features And Price Comparison


New HTC Desire Eye (aka HTC's selfie phone) has recently been introduced in a special HTC event and the release date is expected to be in November. The LG G3, on the other hand, was released in June. Readers who are interested in purchasing the LG G3 or the HTC Desire Eye should check out this comparison.
(Photo: REUTERS / Han Jong-chan/Yonhap)

Display, Exterior And Size
The HTC Desire Eye comes with a 5.2-inch LCD display complemented by 1,080 x 1,920 pixels screen resolution, while the LG G3 features a relatively bigger 5.5-inch True HD-IPS + LCD display and 1,440 x 2,560 pixels resolution. While the LG device comes with a pixel density of 534 ppi, the HTC handset clocks 424 ppi.
When it comes to design, the Desire Eye smartphone features high quality plastic exterior when compared to the flagship HTC One (M8). The company has put in efforts to improve the front and rear cameras and in the process, the Duo Camera feature seen in the One M8 is removed. Furthermore, the device comes with a physical camera shutter button. In general, the Desire Eye is a worthy enhancement of the HTC One M8, reports ZDNet. Meanwhile, the LG G3 comes with a plastic exterior, however the metallic-effect on the plastic body is convincing enough and it offers the much-loved premium look to the device. The highlight of the G3 is its killer display. The sheer size and sky high-resolution take the viewing experience to another level. Plus, the rear panel is removable, according to Tech Radar.
Speaking of size, the thickness and weight of the HTC smartphone are 0.33-inch and 154 g respectively, while the LG G3 is 0.35-inch thick and weighs 149 g. Hence, the LG handset is lighter but the HTC device is thinner.
Hardware, Software And Memory
Both the smartphones are powered by the same quad-core (Qualcomm Snapdragon 801) Krait 400 processor. Nevertheless, the processors of the LG and HTC handsets are clocked at 2.5 GHz and 2.3 GHz, respectively.  While the G3 is backed by a solid 2 or 3 GB of RAM choices, the Desire Eye settles for 2 GB.
Moreover, the LG G3 runs oikn Android 4.4.2 KitKat OS, whereas the Desire Eye runs on the same Android version as the G3 with HTC Sense 6 UI on top of it. When it comes to memory, the LG handset provides 16 GB and 32 GB of internal storage options, whereas the HTC handset comes equipped with 16 GB storage. Readers should note that, the G3's 16 GB model comes with 2 GB of RAM, whereas the 32 GB variant comes packed with 3 GB. Plus, both the devices support expandable storage up to 128 GB.
Camera And Battery
Quite interestingly, both the handsets sport the same 13 MP primary camera unit with dual-LED (dual tone) flash. Additionally, the HTC smartphone houses a killer 13 MP front-facing camera unit, staying true to the name selfie smartphone. The unique feature, however, is the frontal flash i.e. dual-LED (dual tone) on the Desire Eye handset to capture impressive selfies.
Moreover, HTC's front and back snapper units can capture 1080p videos. Plus, there is a Split Capture feature that can split the captured image into 50:50 by combining the images shot from the front as well from the rear cameras. In addition, there is a Crop-Me-In option that can be used to embed the user's image into any other form of image, similar to photo-shopping the picture. Other significant camera-centric apps housed in the device include HTC Eye Experience and HTC Zoe, according to GSM Arena.
Moving to LG G3's camera features, the handset comes with optical image stabilization (OIS), simultaneous video and image recording and 4K video recording options. Moreover, the G3 is well-known for its impressive camera software features. The unique features include "Laser Autofocus Sensor" and "Selfie Mode," to name a few. According to LG, the laser autofocus sensor is very fast that it demands only 0.276 seconds to focus an object/person. Plus, the G3 camera supports voice activation. Moving to battery configuration, the LG handset houses a good Li-Ion 3000 mAh unit, whereas the HTC device settles for a relatively inferior Li-Ion 2400 mAh battery unit.
Additional Features
1. The LG G3 comes equipped with wireless charging capability, while the Desire Eye doesn't. The HTC Desire Eye, meanwhile, features the well-received HTC BoomSoundspeakers. Moreover, the Desire Eye comes with water- and dust-resistant exterior (IPX7 certified), whereas the LG G3 doesn't.
2. The HTC handset comes with a microphone housed near the selfie camera. In addition to the frontal microphone there is one at the rear and another one on the bottom of the smartphone. This translates to a total of three microphones to provide quality audio reception alongside the noise cancellation feature, reports GSM Arena.
3. While the LG device employs micro-SIM, the HTC smartphone supports nano-SIM. In addition to the standard connectivity options, both the handsets support 4G LTE and NFC. Furthermore, the LG handset supports Infrared port, while the Desire Eye doesn't.
4. HTC's Zoe app offers collaborative video editing feature on the Desire Eye. In addition, Zoe can pair with RE, the brand new stand-alone, action camera from HTC. The good news is that, global Android users will also to get to benefit from Zoe, because this app is not exclusive to HTC smartphones. The company will roll out Zoe to all Android users in future. Adding cherry on top, Zoe's Apple iOS app will be released sometime towards the end of 2014.
5. Additionally, the HTC Eye Experience camera app is not exclusive to Desire Eye. HTC will introduce the app to One (M8), One (E8), One (M7), One Mini, One Mini 2, One Max, One Remix, Desire 612 and Desire 816 shortly.
Price
The LG G3 (16 GB, 4G LTE) model can be purchased for AU$539.95 in Australia. Readers should note that, the price of the LG handset has come down tremendously from the time the device was released. The HTC Desire Eye, meanwhile, will be an AT&T-exclusive device upon release. The handset is priced at €529 in France that roughly translates to US$670 and AU$767, reports NWE.

Huawei Honor 6 Extreme Edition is official with Kirin 928 chip


At an event today in Beijing, Huawei officially unveiled the Honor 6 Extreme Edition packing the company's latest Kirin 928 chipset. Its comprised of an 2GHz octa-core CPU, 3GB of RAM and Mali T628MP4 GPU. We're yet to see how much faster the Kirin 928 is compared to the Kirin 920 found in the Honor 6.
Visually, the phone retains the exterior of its predecessor and keeps the 5" 1080p display. The phone runs the latest Android 4.4 KitKat out of the box and offers LTE-A Cat.6 for the networks that support it.
Internal storage is 32GB and is expandable via the microSD card slot (up to 128GB). At the back, there's a 13MP snapper teamed up with a 5MP front-facing shooter. Under the non-removable back cover sits the same 3,100mAh battery as on the original Honor 6.
The company is also launching a bunch of accessories for the Honor 6 Extreme Edition. Expect specially designed headphones, a 0.2mm tempered glass screen protector, 2 NFC tags and a limited edition "Road and force" protective shell.
Huawei will only make 9,999 units of the Honor 6 Extreme Edition and will retail for $489 (RYB 2,999). Pre-orders start on October 21.


Tuesday, 14 October 2014

The Apple Watch's Achilles Heel is the iPhone

By: Chunka Mui

Now that the dust has settled on the long-anticipated unveiling of the Apple Watch, a major obstacle to its success is coming into view: the iPhone.

The Apple Watch has been the subject of breathless anticipation for years because, as Tim Cook said at its introduction, it represents “the next chapter in Apple’s story.” Conceived three years ago, shortly after Steve Jobs’ passing, the Watch is the embodiment of multiple dramatic arcs and aspirations.
It is the first major new product developed under Tim Cook and Jony Ive outside of Jobs’ shadow—and thus has huge personal and legacy implications for both men.
The Watch is also Apple’s attempt to catalyze and dominate the wearables category. Given the intense competition in the smartphone market and the widespread view that new killer products, platforms and ecosystems will emerge somewhere at the intersection of the Internet of Things and wearable computing, the Watch is central to Apple’s post-iPhone strategy.
It might seem that the iPhone should be the Apple Watch’s greatest asset. Apple is positioning the Watch as a jaw dropping, must-have peripheral to the iPhone. Millions of iPhone-toting Apple fans are sure to queue up upon the Watch’s 2015 launch to buy it. But, do not mistake early adopters for market validation. For billions of other potential customers, the Watch’s close linkage and tethering to the iPhone could be a fundamental weakness.
In the short term, Apple must convince existing customers that they need a Watch in addition to their iPhone. Apple, however, has yet to offer a convincing case for this.
Long rumored groundbreaking health apps built on Watch-mounted sensors have not materialized—disappointing many healthcare watchers (including me). That leaves Apple competing against more narrowly focused wearable devices like the Fitbit and Pebble—but at multiple times the price and fractions of the battery life.
Apple is also touting Apple Pay as a killer app that will attract consumers to the Watch. But, while Apple Pay is an intriguing service-oriented strategy for Apple, there is no need for consumers to buy an Apple Watch to use it. Apple Pay will work fine with just the iPhone.
For now, it seems that Apple has higher hopes for the Watch as a fashion accessory than as a category-defining killer app. But, even that highbrow aspiration has ample skeptics who question the Watch’s fashion chops andbusiness potential.
In the long term, when and if compelling apps emerge for the Watch, Apple will have to convince Watch enthusiasts that they need an iPhone in addition to the Watch.
This might not seem like a limiting factor given that there are more than 300 million active iPhone users. But, imagine if the iPhone were just a peripheral to the Mac, thereby limiting its addressable market to Mac owners. Or, imagine if the iPhone had to be tethered to the iPod. Do not such scenarios, in retrospect, sound implausibly shortsighted?
Both the Mac and the iPod were great products with loyal followings at the iPhone’s introduction. Apple, however, did not limit the iPhone to its predecessors’ market niches. As shown in Figure 1, the result was a blockbuster that lifted Apple far beyond those earlier products. The iPhone has grown to represent more than half of Apple’s revenues and perhaps even more of its profits.
Figure 1 — Apple Device Sales
Figure 1 — Apple Device Sales
Now the iPhone has a loyal following but a small share of the smartphone market. Will Tim Cook limit the Apple Watch’s success to iPhone owners, or will Cook free it to dominate the potentially larger wearable devices space?
Freeing the Watch is a strategic imperative.
History tells us that market leading technology products like the iPhone inevitably fade. The companies that depend on them must innovate into the succeeding categories or fade as well. Kodak, Polaroid, IBM, DEC, Nokia, Motorola, Blackberry, Intel, Sony, Dell and Microsoft are among those fading or faded companies.


All of those other companies underutilized disruptive advances in information technology for (at best) incremental enhancements to their dominant products. By doing so, they missed out on new killer products, business models and industries that coalesced around the new platforms enabled by those technology advances.

Thus, Kodak wasted decades trying to deploy digital photography (which it invented) as an enhancer to its dominant film-driven businesses. Microsoft was slow to the web and the cloud and killed its early e-reader and tablet devices because of internecine struggles over how those new categories related to its Windows and Office businesses. The list goes on: IBM did not lead in minicomputers. DEC and every other leading minicomputer maker missed out on personal computers. Motorola and Nokia were killed by smartphones, and Blackberry is near death.
Limiting the Watch to a peripheral role in the iPhone-centric ecosystem would repeat the same mistake made by those earlier market leading technology companies.

That’s not to say there is not a lot of money to be made in the defend-the-cash-cow approach. Just look at the more than $650B in revenue and nearly $250B in earnings that Steve Ballmer delivered in his tenure as Microsoft CEO. Ballmer achieved those impressive numbers by defending and milking Microsoft’s dominant Office and Windows products. Ballmer, Microsoft and its investors missed out, however, on the market value created by Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter and others who capitalized on search, big data, cloud computing, mobile devices and social media. Ballmer’s inability to grow beyond the core products that he inherited stagnated Microsoft’s market value for a decade.
Likewise, Tim Cook could nurse Apple’s iPhone-driven revenue stream for a long time. I doubt, however, that Tim Cook would be satisfied with a value-creation legacy comparable to Steve Ballmer’s.
It is too early to dismiss the Apple Watch’s potential to transcend the iPhone.
We’ll get a measure of Apple’s foresight when it releases the software development kit (SDK) for the Watch. That will show how fundamentally tethered the Watch is to the iPhone and whether Apple has laid the groundwork for the Watch to be standalone at some point.
The real gut check for Tim Cook is further out in time, when technology and creativity enables wearable devices like the Watch to not only stand alone from the iPhone but also to replace it.
Will Tim Cook allow the Watch to cannibalize iPhone sales—as Apple previously allowed the iPhone to eat away at the iPod and risked the iPad doing the same to the Mac? Or, will Apple stagnate as competitors and new entrants out-innovate it? Will Apple fade away as the riches from new killer apps, devices, ecosystems and business models that coalesce around emerging wearables-centric platforms flow to others?

HTC One M8 vs. Samsung Galaxy S5 Comparison: Review of Specs, Features and Price Between Devices


BY: VIRNELLI MERCADER 
Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8

Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8i
Samsung and HTC have a history of competing with each other when it comes to their smartphones. Now, the battle of the phones is on once again between the Samsung Galaxy S5 and the HTC One M8.
Design:
The M8's design is a step up from its predecessor, which now features an aluminum casing that covers most of the frame. The back and sides are now curved, and it's 9.35mm thin and weighs 160 grams. The phone is initially available in metallic grey, which will be followed by variants that come in silver and rose gold.
Meanwhile, the Galaxy S5 sports a wider back and a textured battery cover. It comes in three colors—white, blue, and copper. The home button now has a fingerprint scanner, and the phone's IP67 rating means that it is now water resistant, but taking it for a dip in the pool is not advised.
Features:
The M8 runs on the Android KitKat 4.4 and is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chip. It has the Blinkfeed feature which makes it easier to personalize access to content, sites and topics. It sports a 5-inch screen with a 1920 x 1080 resolution and has front facing speakers that give a richer sound quality.
The Galaxy S5 sports a bigger and brighter screen than the S4 and it measures 5.1 inches with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. It has the S Health feature that tracks the owner's well-being which includes a heart rate monitor under the camera, a calorie counter, and a pedometer. The phone has a Download Booster, which combines the speed of 4G and Wi-Fi.
Price:
M8 starts at $199.99 on contract while the SIM-free versions cost $820, while the Galaxy S5 starts at $199 on contract and the unlocked version costs about $750.

HTC One M8 vs. Samsung Galaxy S5 Comparison: Review of Specs, Features and Price Between Devices


BY: VIRNELLI MERCADER 
Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8

Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One M8i
Samsung and HTC have a history of competing with each other when it comes to their smartphones. Now, the battle of the phones is on once again between the Samsung Galaxy S5 and the HTC One M8.
Design:
The M8's design is a step up from its predecessor, which now features an aluminum casing that covers most of the frame. The back and sides are now curved, and it's 9.35mm thin and weighs 160 grams. The phone is initially available in metallic grey, which will be followed by variants that come in silver and rose gold.
Meanwhile, the Galaxy S5 sports a wider back and a textured battery cover. It comes in three colors—white, blue, and copper. The home button now has a fingerprint scanner, and the phone's IP67 rating means that it is now water resistant, but taking it for a dip in the pool is not advised.
Features:
The M8 runs on the Android KitKat 4.4 and is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chip. It has the Blinkfeed feature which makes it easier to personalize access to content, sites and topics. It sports a 5-inch screen with a 1920 x 1080 resolution and has front facing speakers that give a richer sound quality.
The Galaxy S5 sports a bigger and brighter screen than the S4 and it measures 5.1 inches with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. It has the S Health feature that tracks the owner's well-being which includes a heart rate monitor under the camera, a calorie counter, and a pedometer. The phone has a Download Booster, which combines the speed of 4G and Wi-Fi.
Price:
M8 starts at $199.99 on contract while the SIM-free versions cost $820, while the Galaxy S5 starts at $199 on contract and the unlocked version costs about $750.

Sunday, 5 October 2014

Nokia Lumia 735 Review: The Selfie Smartphone Is The Cameraphone For The Social Media Generation